Yes, under Australian family law, a couple can be legally separated while still living under the same roof. This is known as "separation under one roof", and it is recognised under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Separation occurs when at least one party communicates that the relationship is over, and both parties start living separately, even if they remain in the same household.
However, if a party later applies for divorce, they may need to provide evidence to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) to prove that separation actually occurred while living together.
Living under the same roof after separation can have practical, emotional, and legal implications:
Many couples remain in the same house for reasons such as:
💡 While living together post-separation is common, clear boundaries must be set to establish that separation has occurred.
Living under the same roof can lead to:
If a couple remains in the same house but later applies for divorce, they must prove to the court that they were genuinely separated for at least 12 months. This may involve:
📑 Providing a sworn affidavit – Both parties may need to submit statements outlining:
💡 If only one party applies for divorce, they must provide additional evidence, such as witness statements from friends, family, or professionals (e.g., counsellors or doctors) to confirm that the separation is genuine.
If living together becomes untenable, one party may apply to the Family Court for an order granting them exclusive occupation of the home. This means that one party can legally remain in the house, and the other must move out, even if both parties jointly own or rent the property.
Under the Family Law Act, the court considers:
✔️ Best interests of children – If children live in the home, the court prioritises their stability and welfare. The parent with primary care may be more likely to remain in the home.
✔️ Financial ability of each party – The court examines whether both parties can afford alternative accommodation.
✔️ Evidence of domestic violence or safety concerns – If there is family violence, the court may grant exclusive use to protect a vulnerable party.
✔️ Ownership or legal interest in the home – If the home is owned by one party, this may affect the decision. However, ownership alone does not automatically grant exclusive possession.
✔️ The practicality of cohabitation – If constant conflict or emotional distress arises from living together, the court may order one party to leave.
💡 If exclusive use is granted, the other party may still have financial claims to the property during settlement.
💡 If exclusive use is granted, the party staying may need to compensate the other financially, depending on the final property settlement.
🔹 Try to negotiate an agreement with your ex-partner.
🔹 Seek mediation if disputes arise.
🔹 Apply for an exclusive occupation order if cohabitation is unsafe or impractical.
🔹 Get legal advice to protect your rights during property settlement.
Conclusion